Here is the context: Please enter a colleagues email address: My coworker believes that in this context, it should be colleagues. I think that because it is a possessive noun, that it should be
nouns - Colleagues or Colleague's? - English Language & Usage Stack ...
According to the definition you yourself quote, colleagues are people who work together. One's business partners, again according to the quotation in the answer, are the people who share the responsibility for the financial aspects of the business, not necessarily for its day-to-day operation.
If you are suggesting something formal, talking from position of rights or power, you may want to use more formal "Dear Colleagues" to make the argument stronger. If you are making a proposal, and want to downplay it as in "hey, it's an idea, a basis for further thinking and please judge it as such", a simple 'All,' would do a better job.
As I understand it, what prompted this question was the palatability of the phrase "my colleagues and me". I find that (re)grouping the phrase as "for my colleagues and me" renders it completely unremarkable. That is to say, the words as written don't get in the way of conveying the message.
What would you call the "colleagues" of someone in a cohort (specifically educational context)? Ask Question Asked 9 years, 2 months ago Modified 4 years, 1 month ago
What would you call the "colleagues" of someone in a cohort ...
5 At my university, professors usually refer to other students as our colleagues and encourage us to do so during presentations and talks.
The capitalization does not make it polite or impolite. If I were writing this, and sending it to my colleagues, I would write "Dear Colleagues," I do not like "DearAll," and prefer to address the people receiving the email; "Dear Cisco Employees / Sales Team / 2015 Award Winers," etc.
Have a look at @tchrist 's answer in the [Saxon Genitive or adjective] (Saxon Genitive or adjective) for a start. And adding to Peter's answer, if you are rating the colleagues, a 'colleague rating system' is another and perhaps stylistically preferable option. // Peter's comment shows the advantage in keeping the apostrophe for cases of possession-rather-than-association.
explain, expound, explicate, elucidate, interpret mean to make something clear or understandable. explain implies a making plain or intelligible what is not immediately obvious or entirely known.
EXPLAIN meaning: 1. to make something clear or easy to understand by describing or giving information about it: 2…. Learn more.
To explain is to make plain, clear, or intelligible something that is not known or understood: to explain a theory or a problem. To elucidate is to throw light on what before was dark and obscure, usually by illustration and commentary and sometimes by elaborate explanation: They asked him to elucidate his statement.
Explain, elucidate, expound, interpret imply making the meaning of something clear or understandable. To explain is to make plain, clear, or intelligible something that is not known or understood: to explain a theory or a problem.
Synonyms: explain, elucidate, explicate, interpret, construe These verbs mean to make the nature or meaning of something understandable. Explain is the most widely applicable: The professor used a diagram to explain the theory of continental drift. The manual explained how the new software worked.
Explain is the most general of these words, and means to make plain, clear, and intelligible. Expound is used of elaborate, formal, or methodical explanation: as, to expound a text, the law, the philosophy of Aristotle.
EXPLAIN definition: to make plain or clear; render understandable or intelligible. See examples of explain used in a sentence.
explain (third-person singular simple present explains, present participle explaining, simple past and past participle explained) (transitive) To make plain, manifest, or intelligible; to clear of obscurity; to illustrate the meaning of.
to make clear in speech or writing; make plain or understandable by analysis or description. The instructor explained the operation of the engine to the students.
The two conceded that problems of bias were rampant in existing polling methods, saying that “pollsters can use modeling to nudge polls in a certain direction and influence public opinion itself, rather than merely to report what the public actually thinks.”