Tanya Jo Spilsbury Graff was born in Cedar City, Utah to LeGrande and Bette Lu Spilsbury accompanied by a twin brother that they didn’t know they were having. She passed away March 18, ...
PAUL LEWIS SPILSBURY Paul Lewis Spilsbury, 75, of Coeur d’Alene, Idaho, husband, father, stepfather, grandfather, great-grandfather and brother, passed away on 11 November 2020. He was born in Boulder ...
The verb provide has two different subcategorisation frames: provide something [ to somebody] provide somebody with something In the first, the material provided is the object, in the second the recipient is the object. Both are valid, and both are in common use. The difference between them is the with phrase, which must be there to get meaning 2: if there is only one (direct) object, then ...
Provide can be either transitive or intransitive. All of your sentences above appear correct (as provide can take both a direct and an indirect object, and the "with" may be implied, as in your 2nd sentence). 1 [ trans. ] make available for use; supply : these clubs provide a much appreciated service for this area. ( provide someone with) equip or supply someone with (something useful or ...
prepositions - Usage of the verb "provide" - English Language & Usage ...
In other words, these are questions of coherent and natural-sounding phrasing, rather than strictly grammar, I believe. "Provide for the common good" is an example of "provide" without an A and a B, by the way. You can "provide for" something, or "provision" something, or "provide" something to someone.
prepositions - “provide X to someone” vs “provide X for someone ...
Could you please advise; which of the following is correct: 1. Please ensure to provide Dan and me with your report by XX. 2. Please ensure to provide Dan and me your report by XX. Many thanks
grammar - Provide vs. provide with - English Language & Usage Stack ...
"Provide me with" or "Provide me" [Topic phrase added to post. DonnyB - moderator] Which one is correct?
To provide [something] to [someone] is a far more recent usage... Per @JeffSahol's answer, provide X to Y often implies that Y did actually receive X, whereas provide X for Y can be used even if Y doesn't avail himself of the X which is on offer. But often it's an idiomatic choice where people repeat the version they hear most.
My question: are the following sentences grammatically correct? 1. Thank you for the document (that) you provided. 2. Thank you for the document (that) you provided me. 3. Thank you for the document (that) you provided me with. I think it is sentence 1 and 3 that are correct. Thank you in...
Is it grammatically correct " Which is correct sentence: "Please provide me with the following documents" or "Please provide me the following documents"
Omitting but leads to a nasty comma splice. But 's role as a coordinating conjunction is to join those two independent clauses. You could, however, use a semicolon: Not only would it provide...; it also would... In my opinion, the quoted example ("Rowers not only face backward, they race backward.") is grammatically incorrect. I would use a semicolon or include but before they.
I'm always wondering when I want to write a sentence with provide. What is the correct way to say/write: to provide someone with something to provide someone something to provide something to someo...
word choice - What are direct and indirect objects to "provide ...